![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Case Studies Geotechnical | Petroleum | Geothermal | Request References Geotechnical Excavation and Rippability | Void and Utility Detection | Basement Mapping | Fault Mapping
Void and Utility Detection
Bay Geophyical of Traverse City, Michigan, used @2D to find voids and merging utilities
along a buried concrete pipeline. The only data input used to produce the velocity
model was the first arrival shear wave travel-time data, and array geometry.
No other a priori data were used. This is a velocity model from one
of the lines. Notice the detail at which near-surface velocities were modeled.
In fact, the petroleum industry uses our software for near-surface velocity static
corrections because of the detail in which near-surface velocities are revealed. The
pipeline runs parallel to the seismic array. The poured concrete pipeline bed is shown
correctly at about 15 feet depth (elevation of 11 feet). The soil above
the pipeline shows a gradient as a result of burial pressure. A utility tunnel
intersecting the pipeline was imaged at about offset 290 feet, centered at about 10
feet depth (elevation of about 16 feet). The velocity model also picked up
some subtle lateral velocity features in the soil associated with the construction and burial of the tunnel. There is also a localized slight velocity reversal, indicating a void,
at about offset 370 feet, elevation about 6 feet.
![]() There was no need to guess if the target area was properly sampled during the interpretation. SeisOptŪ @2D provides a hit count plot of ray coverage in the subsurface. If an area is not sampled, SeisOptŪ truncates it so you don't try and make an interpretation of potential artifacts. As you can see, there was dense ray coverage of the entire velocity model, indicating a high degree of confidence in the interpretation.
![]() About Us Products Peer-Reviewed Papers Services Support and Service Case Studies Employment Contact Us Home |
|||||||
|
||||||||